Slack logovsMicrosoft Teams logo

Slack vs Microsoft Teams: Independent comparison

The channel-native pioneer vs the M365-bundled default. Slack for tool integration; Teams if you already run M365. This comparison currently favours Slack in the default buyer context; Microsoft Teams pulls ahead when the buyer prioritises the criteria highlighted below.

Last reviewed 2026-07-10 Pricing verified 2026-07-10 6 sources Editorial confidence: Medium

Set your context — the verdict adapts

Best for mid-marketSlack logoSlack

Weighted for product fit and integrations.

Choose Slack when

Choose Slack when all teams matches your buyer, and you value channels and ecosystem.

Choose Microsoft Teams when

Choose Microsoft Teams when enterprise matches your buyer, and you value bundled with m365.

Consider another option when

Neither is ideal when your team needs a category-specific collaboration tuned to a single vertical workflow — a specialist alternative usually wins on time-to-value.

Best for startups

Slack logo

Slack

Weighted for time-to-value and entry price.

Best for mid-market

Slack logo

Slack

Weighted for product fit and integrations.

Best for enterprise

Slack logo

Slack

Weighted for customisation, security and scale.

Fastest implementation

Slack logo

Slack

Weighted purely for time-to-value.

Lowest entry cost

Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Weighted purely for verified entry price.

Most customisable

Slack logo

Slack

Weighted for extensibility and APIs.

At a glance

Starting price
Slack: $7.25/mo
Microsoft Teams: $4/mo
Typical buyer
Slack: All teams
Microsoft Teams: Enterprise
Founded
Slack: 2013
Microsoft Teams: 2017
Headquarters
Slack: San Francisco, CA
Microsoft Teams: Redmond, WA
Company size
Slack: 2,500+
Microsoft Teams: N/A
Verified rating
Slack: 4.5 (32,100 reviews)
Microsoft Teams: 4.1 (15,800 reviews)
Core strengths
Slack: Channels, Ecosystem
Microsoft Teams: Bundled with M365

Detailed criteria

Core product fit

Weight in this context: 16%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 8/10

Winner
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 6/10

Weighted verified review sentiment for Collaboration, normalised across seat sizes.

Sources: Slack verified reviews · Microsoft Teams verified reviews

Time to value

Weight in this context: 10%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 8/10

Winner
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 7/10

How quickly a typical team gets to first productive use without paid services.

Sources: Slack verified reviews · Microsoft Teams verified reviews

Entry price

Weight in this context: 10%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 9/10

Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 10/10

Winner

Verified public entry pricing: Slack $7.25/mo, Microsoft Teams $4/mo.

Sources: Slack pricing page · Microsoft Teams pricing page

Total cost of ownership

Weight in this context: 12%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 9/10

Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 9/10

Combined entry price and typical add-ons / services needed at 12 months.

Sources: Slack pricing page · Microsoft Teams pricing page

Ease of use

Weight in this context: 10%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 8/10

Winner
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 7/10

Admin and end-user friction based on verified reviews and hands-on notes.

Sources: Slack verified reviews · Microsoft Teams verified reviews

Integrations & ecosystem

Weight in this context: 14%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 8/10

Winner
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 7/10

Breadth of native integrations and marketplace depth.

Sources: Slack verified reviews · Microsoft Teams verified reviews

Customisation & extensibility

Weight in this context: 14%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 8/10

Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 8/10

APIs, custom objects, and configuration ceiling.

Sources: Slack verified reviews · Microsoft Teams verified reviews

Support

Weight in this context: 7%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 7/10

Winner
Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 6/10

Included support channels and verified responsiveness.

Sources: Slack verified reviews · Microsoft Teams verified reviews

Security & compliance

Weight in this context: 7%
Slack logo

Slack

Score 9/10

Microsoft Teams logo

Microsoft Teams

Score 9/10

Attestations, data residency and admin controls.

Sources: Slack trust & security · Microsoft Teams trust & security

Scoring methodology

The contextual result above is a weighted average of criterion scores. Weights change with your selected company size, so the same underlying scores can produce a different winner for a startup than for an enterprise.

CriterionDefaultIn Mid-market
Core product fit16%16%
Time to value14%10%
Entry price12%10%
Total cost of ownership12%12%
Ease of use10%10%
Integrations & ecosystem10%14%
Customisation & extensibility10%14%
Support8%7%
Security & compliance8%7%

Evidence and sources

6 sources used in this comparison.

Slack pricing pageSlack · Official pricingAccessed 2026-07-10

https://slack.com/pricing

Microsoft Teams pricing pageMicrosoft Teams · Official pricingAccessed 2026-07-10

https://microsoft.com/pricing

Slack trust & securitySlack · Security documentationAccessed 2026-07-10

https://slack.com/security

Microsoft Teams trust & securityMicrosoft Teams · Security documentationAccessed 2026-07-10

https://microsoft.com/security

Slack verified reviewsG2 aggregate · Verified review corpusAccessed 2026-07-10

https://www.g2.com/products/slack/reviews

Microsoft Teams verified reviewsG2 aggregate · Verified review corpusAccessed 2026-07-10

https://www.g2.com/products/teams/reviews

What changed

DateChangeReasonReviewer
2026-07-10Entry pricing re-verified for Slack and Microsoft TeamsQuarterly pricing reviewChooseOS analyst desk
2026-05-18Scores refreshed against latest verified review corpusRolling review refreshChooseOS analyst desk

Independence statement

This comparison was researched independently. Neither Slack nor Microsoft Teams paid to alter its inclusion, criteria, scores, rankings or verdict.

Official vendor perspectives

Each vendor may publish an equal-format response. Vendor content is labelled and does not influence the independent verdict above.

Slack's perspective

No official response published. If you represent Slack, claim your profile to publish one.

Microsoft Teams's perspective

No official response published. If you represent Microsoft Teams, claim your profile to publish one.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Which is better overall, Slack or Microsoft Teams?

There is no universal winner. In this context (company size, priorities and use case above), the weighted verdict favours Slack, but the contextual verdict cards show where each product wins.

How does Slack pricing compare to Microsoft Teams?

Full pricing is verified quarterly and shown in the criteria section above. Headline prices rarely reflect total cost of ownership — factor in implementation, add-ons, integrations and support tier when you compare.

Is this comparison paid for by either vendor?

No. Neither Slack nor Microsoft Teams paid to alter inclusion, criteria, scores or the analyst verdict. Vendors may publish an official perspective in the labelled section above; those do not affect the independent analysis.

How current is this comparison?

Last reviewed 2026-07-10. Pricing was re-verified 2026-07-10. Material changes are added to the public change history.

Can I request a comparison ChooseOS hasn't published?

Buyers can suggest matchups via Contact — buyer signal is what drives our publishing queue. Verified vendors can request head-to-head comparisons directly from their profile.